Free webinars about the impact of health inequities
CEDAR’s Health Inequities Seminar Series aims to build awareness and advance understanding about the impact systemic health inequities have on cancer early detection and treatment though interactive talks and discussion with leaders in the field.
All are welcome.
Reach out with any questions or let us know if there's a speaker you'd recommend or a topic you'd like to see discussed here.
Join us at our next event:
"Addressing Rural Colorectal Cancer Inequities through Participatory Implementation Science"
Melinda M. Davis, Ph.D., MCR
Associate Professor, Family Medicine and Public Health
Associate Director, Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network (ORPRN)
Oregon Health & Science University
This event will take place at the Knight Cancer Research Building Auditorium, room 1015, located at 2720 S. Moody Ave., Portland, OR 97201 and will also be available via Webex. Those interested are welcome to attend in-person or virtually.
Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) and community engaged research can help bridge the gap between research and practice. This talk will provide a brief history of PBRNs and practice facilitation, define participatory implementation science, and highlight rural cancer disparities with a focus on interventions to improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. This foundation will be used to provide an illustrative example of partnered work with rural patients, clinics, and health plans leading to an NCI-funded Cancer Moonshot award to improve CRC screening and follow-up care titled “Screening More patients for CRC through Adapting and Refining Targeted Evidence-based Interventions in Rural settings (SMARTER CRC).” Status of the pragmatic trial will be shared along with lessons learned from a decade of research in rural settings, including dynamic adaptations made in response to Covid-19.
• Define practice-based research and practice facilitation
• Identify multilevel factors contributing to rural cancer disparities
• Provide an example of participatory implementation science in action
Melissa B. Davis, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology
Scientific Director, International Center for the Study of Breast Cancer Subtypes
Member, Caryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine
Weill Cornell Medical College
Thursday, Jan. 27, 2022
1-2 p.m. PST
Dr. Davis is a molecular geneticist with expertise in genomics and systems biology. Her research focuses on discerning multifocal contributions to cancer risk and disparities in clinical oncology outcomes, and on linking this information back to genetic ancestry, particularly sub-Saharan West African ancestry.
Her breast cancer research has identified that an African-ancestry allele and the recently discovered tumor expression of a gene named DARC (ACKR1) are linked to the tumor-specific immune/inflammatory response. Emerging findings from this project indicate that immune response in tumors of African Americans may be linked to worse clinical outcomes but also have potential for novel targeted therapies.
Dr. Davis discussed the latest gene signatures associated with genetic ancestry and social constructs and how these may intersect to impact clinical outcomes in breast cancer.
Robert Winn, M.D.
Director and Lipman Chair in Oncology, VCU Massey Cancer Center
Senior Associate Dean for Cancer Innovation and Professor of Pulmonary Disease and Critical Care Medicine, VCU School of Medicine
Wednesday, Oct. 20, 2021
1-2 p.m. PDT
In 2020, the AACR’s U.S. Cancer Disparities Progress Report showed that there is still a significant gap in cancer incidence and mortality between white Americans and other racial and ethnic groups. That’s not because the science hasn’t progressed or because people of color are biologically predisposed to cancer. It’s because the systems and structures put in place decades ago continue to harm the health of racial and ethnic minorities.
When COVID-19 hit, many of us were not surprised that communities of color were disproportionately affected. The current situation with COVID-19 vaccines is a great demonstration that while science is necessary for improving health, it’s not sufficient. Those amazingly effective vaccines can’t keep hospitals from being overwhelmed if a large percentage of the population won’t get the shot, just as advances in cancer screening and treatment can’t end disparities if
they’re predominantly going to wealthy white people.
This realization has been one of our blind spots as scientists and physicians. Not only must we work toward equitable access to care, but we must also work on building trust in medicine, which we do by demonstrating that we’re trustworthy. There’s a science to it, though we’re going to have to allow for greater flexibility and messiness than we’re accustomed to.