Guide to Sample Preparation
Sample preparation is one of the often overlooked steps in achieving high quality results in a proteomics experiment. Despite the enormous technical advances in mass spectrometric instrumentation and software, contaminated samples can easily overwhelm the most advanced mass spectrometer and extremely bad samples can actually render a mass spectrometer unusable for an extended period of time.
MAXIM – the cleaner your sample the better your data!
Contaminated samples can cause delays in their own processing as well as with other samples passing through our core facility. What follows are some guidelines which can hopefully help your project avoid some of the more common problems. As for a couple of other sources of information, this short article titled The 11 Golden Rules of Working with Proteomic Samples does a good job of touching on several basic sample preparation concerns that can potentially derail a proteomics experiment. Also this 2014 paper discusses some of the concerns involved when interpreting biological significance from proteomics results.
Experimental Design – Consultation is Available!
The Proteomics Shared Resource does offer consulting for projects prior to sample submission. Consulting prior to submission of a grant is done free of charge, as we are reimbursed for our time from the University. However please feel free to consult with us prior to any experiment as the charges for consultation are minimal, and often waived.
Through consultation we may be able to help you identify ways you can alter your procedures so that you can better achieve your goals. For some experiments, especially those where you wish to look for differences in protein abundance, careful preparation is a must.
When it comes time for sample submission, the majority of the samples we accept consist of purified undigested protein mixtures (either in solution or lyophilized), or isolated proteins in a SDS-page gel. Depending on the physical state of the protein(s) at the time of sample submission we may have different concerns.
Liquid / Lyophilized Samples
As you may know from working in a laboratory setting over the years the majority of reagents come in one of two forms: clear liquids or white powders. Protein samples also fall into this category. What we likely receive upon sample submission is a rather plain looking sample, with no clue as to what is contained inside! Though we all hope there are proteins in the sample, the sad truth is there are other contaminants which can greatly hinder our ability to see those proteins we our instruments. Below is a list of chemicals and other contaminants that we know to be incompatible with our instruments.
- Significant particulate or insoluble material
- Radioactive or Biohazardous substances
- Salts: NaCl, KCl, Phosphates, and other non-volatile salts
- Detergents: SDS, NP-40, Triton, Tween, etc.
- Cyroprotectants: DMSO, Glycerol, etc.
- Cell debris: nucleic acids, mono- & polysaccharides, lipids, etc.
- PEG, and other polymers
If you are unsure about a chemical in your procedure please ask us about it. We will let you know if it has the potential to cause problems.
Particulate, Insoluble Material, and other Cell Debris
Samples with large amounts of insoluble material pose a threat mostly to our Liquid Chromatography (LC) system. Our chromatographic columns trap insoluble material upstream from them. Over time this material can build up, causing the pressure in the LC system to rise and distort the chromatography. In extreme cases the LC system can run over pressure, and halt analysis.
After this type of contamination is introduced, columns and LC lines may need to be replaced. We risk losing a couple of days or up to a week or more of instrument time, and may have to spend upward of $1,000 to replace unusable parts.
Radioactive & Biohazardous Substances
Samples containing radioactive or biohazardous substances are simply NOT accepted at PSR. We are not equipped to handle samples that are still considered to be biohazardous or radioactive. Please make sure any sample that is originally classified as biohazardous is made safe prior to submission.
As for radioactive samples we cannot afford to run them in our mass spectrometers as it violates the conditions of our service contracts.
Detergents and other Polymers
Samples contaminated with detergent are one of the worst things that can get put into a mass spectrometer. Unfortunately they are common in many procedures used to initially extract proteins. While detergent contamination can initially appear similar to salt contamination, the polymer problems associated with it are much more serious. Detergents and other similar polymers have several adverse affects:
- They form a m/z polymer series, similar to non-volatile salts, which competes for MS/MS scans
- They tend to ionize more readily than peptides sucking up electrons and lowering the signal from the peptides
- They get deposited on the column and take an extremely long time to wash off. Some polymers can remain in the system for weeks, diminishing sensitivity and resisting efforts to remove it. Often detergent contamination will render a column unusable, and we will be forced to dispose of it.
- They can coat the innards of a mass spectrometer, meaning the instrument itself may need to be taken apart and cleaned thoroughly. If it is bad enough a service engineer from the mass spectrometer's company may need to respond to clean the instrument.
It is not unusual for a bad case of detergent contamination to bring a mass spectrometer down for a month or more; costing thousands of dollars in lost time and replacement parts.
It is relatively easy to remove detergents from samples if we know it is present. For simple samples this often means we'll run it into an SDS-page gel and use the gel to catch the proteins, and carry away the undesirables. For samples where this isn't an option chromatography on a SCX or Waters MCX column is usually sufficient to remove all but the worst cases of contamination, and often simply running the sample a few centimeters into an SDS-page gel will be sufficient to address most problems. These procedures can be done at PSR if we are made aware of the presence of detergent in your samples. Dialysis usually isn't sufficient to dilute out the detergent as it doesn't take much to cause a large problem.
Fortunately samples submitted to us in a gel are usually free of many of the contamination issues that plague liquid & lyophilized samples. The SDS-page gel is one of the most cost effective ways to remove low amounts of several contaminating compounds, so much so that PSR regularly runs samples into a gel as a quick and inexpensive way to clean up samples given to us in liquid or lyophilized form. That being said gel samples have their own sets of problems.
The biggest potential contaminate is keratin, though there are others. Contamination is such a problem that we will NOT accept samples which have been:
If you would prefer, gels can be run using the equipment and stains present in our lab. Please contact a member of PSR if you'd like to inquire about using our lab equipment.