OHSU

School of Public Health

Review School of Public Health Planning Process to Date

School of Public Health

May 2011–An initial visioning retreat was held bringing together over 50 Faculty from OHSU and PSU to discuss the goal of creating a School of Public Health (SoPH) in which both institutions participate

  • An initial brainstorming session began to identify the potential themes that could make a SoPH unique.
  • Eight workgroups were then identified to further assess potential resources, current curriculum, strengths and weaknesses associated with each of the identified themes.
  • The product of each workgroup was collected and summarized, for subsequent review by the workgroups in preparation for the second visioning session.

January 2012– Review of Workgroup Theme Contributions

The following definitions of each thematic area were developed by the assigned workgroup:

a) Life Course – Health involves events that happen over time.Those influences include social and biological factors, cultural beliefs, history, politics, economics, and individual behaviors. Strengths were identified in maternal child health, family planning, development and aging.

b) Global Health – Use public health approaches to develop, administer, implement, and evaluate culturally sensitive health promotion, disease-prevention and behavior-change programs, as well as to mobilize community resources for planned social change.

c) Community Engagement – A powerful, recognized strength in both institutions for integrating community-based learning, and more traditional field experiences and similar forms of experiential learning, students participate in co-curricular service projects and community-based research.

d) Social Determinants of Health – Focuses on the health outcomes of circumstances in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age. The theme addresses the epidemiology, prevention, and improvement of social factors, as well as relationships among social and biologic factors, influencing physical and mental health, locally, nationally, and globally.

e) Public Health Informatics – Focuses on a major and growing area within the larger field of biomedical and health informatics.Biomedical and health informatics is about capturing, using, and applying information. In the public health sphere, it includes activities such as enhancing disease surveillance and reporting with data from clinical (electronic health record) systems; extending biological research (e.g., genomics) to populations to assess the impact of genes and their interaction with behavior, diet, and the environment on the population's health; and empowering people and communities to improve their health with information tools, such as mobile applications and personal health records.

f) Urban Health – Focuses on the impact of the built environment on human health and how judicious planning of urban environments can lead to improved community health and wellbeing.

The initial analysis conducted by the workgroups clearly indicates that there is a large number of courses through all of the areas required for accreditation.


School of Public Health Vision

As a result of the initial workgroup analysis and subsequent discussion at the second retreat, a common vision began to coalesce around which a unique SoPH could be formed.This potential vision would be best summarized at this early stage of development in the following statement:

"Through world-class education, research and community engagement programs, the SoPH would address the social determinants of health that are critical to maintaining health and wellbeing throughout the lifecycle."

The School would strive to implement this vision by creating a workforce that is competent in community engagement, and a faculty that advanced knowledge through appropriate research directed toward its local, international and special communities.Thus, all educational programs would have, at their core, courses that educate all students in these objectives and require outcomes attained through community engagement.

There was general consensus that this vision could encompass all the thematic areas identified as strengths, could be broadly interpreted, and would create a workforce with special skills, knowledge, and attitudes. Such focus would create a unique SoPH with a mission that is well-aligned with critical societal needs and social equity. Those present were not aware of other major schools that were positioned in this way and thought such a vision would be very attractive to students and Faculty.

School of Public Health Steering Committee

The School of Public Health Steering Committee, four members from each institution in addition to the Provosts, were tasked to develop a work plan, timeline, as well as an organizational and financial model by June 2012. The School of Public Health Steering Committee consist of the following OHSU/PSU Faculty Members:

School of Public Health Steering Committee Members

NAME

TITLE

Elena Andresen, PhD

Chief, Disability & Health Research Group, OHSU

Sona Andrews, PhD

Provost, PSU

Thomas Becker, MD, PhD

Chair, Public Health & Preventative Medicine, OHSU

Jennifer Boyd, MBA, PhD

Assistant Vice Provost for Strategic Planning & Program Development, OHSU

Kathering Bradley, PhD

Clinical Associate Professor, OHSU 

Carlos Juan Crespo, DrPH

Professor, School of Community Health Director, Center for Public Health Studies, Director, Community Health – Urban and Public Affairs, PSU

Veronica Dujon, Phd

Associate Dean, Curriculum Development & Enrollment Management, Liberal ARts and Sciences, PSU

Sherril Gelmon, DrPH

Professor of Public Health, PSU

George Mejicano, MD

Senior Associate Dean for Education, OHSU

Jeanette Mladenovic, MD, MBA, MACP

Provost, OHSU

Laurie Powers, PhD

Professor, Associate Dean for Research, Regional Research Institute – Social Work

David Robinson, PhD

Executive Vice Provost, OHSU

Liana Winett, DrPH, MCHES

Research Associate Professor, School of Community Health, PSU