The Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery

Otology/Neurotology/Skull Base Surgery

General Principles of Acoustic Neuroma Treatment

(information regarding Microsurgery, Serial MRI scans, and Radiosurgery.)


We prefer an individualized treatment strategy for the treatment of acoustic neuromas. When a patient is diagnosed with an acoustic neuroma, there are three possible options for treatment: (1) microsurgical removal of the tumor; (2) watchful waiting; and (3) radiation therapy.

The best course of treatment is determined only after consultation with all key members of the acoustic neuroma treatment team and after detailed discussion with the patient and his or her family.

The goals of treatment are as follows:

  • The total removal of tumor, or the prevention of tumor growth.
  • Normal facial nerve function.
  • Preservation of hearing whenver possible.

The Treatment Options

Microsurgery - At the current time, we feel that microsurgical excision of acoustic neuromas is the best way to meet the goals listed above for most patients. The National Institute of Health feels microsurgical removal is the treatment of choice. With the use of the operating microscope and modern surgical techniques, the risk to the facial nerve and the chance of preserving hearing are both superior to radiosurgery. With microsurgery, the entire tumor can be removed, thus effecting a cure. Radiation treatment retards growth but does not cure.

We use several operative approaches to acoustic neuromas depending upon the size of the tumor and the amount of hearing present preoperatively:

  • The suboccipital approach is used for patients with good hearing since the auditory organs are preserved. It is also used for some larger tumors since the area of access to the tumor is greatest. This approach involves going along the side of the cerebellum to reach the tumor. The advantages of this approach are the large area seen and the preservation of the inner-ear structures in order to preserve hearing.

  • The translabyrinthine approach is used for most patients who already have absent or very poor hearing at the time they are first seen. This approach involves going through the temporal bone and the inner ear, to expose the tumor and nerves without the need to directly expose and retract the cerebellum. The advantage of this approach is that the brain is not manipulated and that the facial nerve may be easier to identify. The disadvantage is that hearing must be sacrificed using this approach.

  • The middle fossa approach is sometimes used as one of the approaches when attempting to preserve hearing.

  • Combined approaches may be used for especially large or difficult tumors. These are individualized for each case and utilize our extensive experience using a large variety of approaches to the skull base.

We use a number of technological aids and monitoring devices while performing these procedures, including the following: