Marcel Wehrli

Assistant Professor - Dept of Cell and Developmental Biology

Cell communication and the role of Wnt signaling in Cancer





Elucidating the Wnt signal transduction mechanism using fruit flies. Secreted molecules of the Wnt family repeatedly provide key signals for cell fate determination and organ formation during development, as well as for stem cell maintenance in the adult.  In addition to its involvement in many other diseases, dysregulation of Wnt signaling

Figure 1. Loss of Arrow causes eye defects. In a Drosophila eye, an unpigmented (white) clone of arrow mutant tissue is visible, which reorganizes the arrangement of the adjacent wild type  eye tissue (red). At the upper dorsal edge, the clone produces ectopic eye tissue in the area normally destined to make head capsule. The arrow mutant clone indirectly organizes polarity and behaves like tissue normally found at the equator of the eye, the dorsoventral midline (Wehrli and Tomlinson, 1998).


Most of what we know about Wnt signaling comes from work in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster.  Some reasons for this are 

Our goal is to understand how cells communicate with each other using the Wnt signaling pathway. In spite of its significance to development and disease, the precise mechanism of Wnt signal transduction remains elusive.  Using Drosophila as a model system, we aim to identify the canonical (Wnt/beta-catenin) signaling mechanism and define key interactions of pathway components that then may serve as drug targets for the treatment of Wnt pathway dysregulation, particularly for cancer and osteoporosis.

Our approach exploits the combination of genetics and molecular biology in Drosophila, which allows a uniquely targeted approach to obtain answers directly where it matters, i.e. in vivo.  Ideally, we design molecularly defined situations that can be directly tested in vivo, e.g. through protein fusion.  In such a situation, we obtain in a single experiment information on function in vivo and physical interactions of proteins that, in other systems, would have to be obtained using different approaches (e.g. biochemistry and overexpression studies) with all their associated problems.

Figure 2. In our model Arrow functions both in signal initiation and signal amplification, which are two separable steps in the transduction mechanism. As a receptor subunit, Arrow (Arr) initiates the cytoplasmic cascade together with Frizzleds (Fz) by activating Dishevelled (Dsh). A fusion protein (Fz2-Arr) can execute this step even in the absence of Wg ligand. The signal transduced to Axin induces this scaffold protein to translocate to the cell membrane, where it interacts with Arrow. In this second step, Arrow inactivates Axin and targets it for degradation.  This second function of Arrow serves to amplify the Wg signal (it may be an obligatory step in the pathway) and we propose that such signal amplification is particularly relevant in situations where little Wnt is present but a signal must be transduced, such as in the shallow part of a Wnt gradient. While Fz2-Arr activated receptor mimics the initiation step but is deficient in amplifying the signal, another Arrow-derived construct (torDArr) exclusively and efficiently amplifies the signal.  Thus, Fz2-Arr and torDArr demonstrate two separate functions of wild type Arrow.  Co-expressed Fz2-Arr and torDArr can largely replace Arrow function, reconstituting the system (Baig-Lewis et al., 2007).

Our contributions (so far)

Figure 3. Signal amplification is dependent on Wnt ligand, thus maintaining a gradient. (A, B) In a developing wing epithelium, Distal-less (Dll, red) expression is induced in response to the Wg/Wnt gradient. Highest levels are present at the source of Wg (white arrowhead) and gradually decline away from it. If torDArr is expressed in a clone (green), the levels of intracellular signal increase and within the clone, levels are highest towards the source of Wg. The graded decline of signal within the clone is similar to that of the wild type tissue adjacent to it, as is apparent if the Dll intensity is plotted against the distance from the source of Wg (C).





Figure 4. Axin complex assembly is robust in vivo. Schematic representation of a protein complex assembled around Axin, which includes APC, Shaggy kinase (Sgg) and the fly beta-catenin, Armadillo (Arm). Interactions between APC, Sgg and Arm, become critically important if a binding site on Axin is lost, for example if the APC binding site RGS is deleted (∆RGS).  Red bars show known interactions.

Potential Rotation Projects:

Lab members:

                        Hidehisa Yamada, M.D. Ph.D., Postdoc
                        Susan Kremer, Research Assistant
                        Kaitlin Leonard, Lab-Aid    

Collaborators (local):

                        Jan Christian, Professor
                        Shailaja Sopory, Ph.D., Postdoc
                        Naz Erdeniz, Research Assistant Professor

Publications

Wehrli, M,, Dougan, S.T., Schwartz, S., Caldwell, K., O'Keefe, L., Vaizel-Ohayon, D., Schejter, E., Tomlinson, A., DiNardo, S. (2000). arrow encodes a LDL receptor related protein essential for the reception of the Wingless signal in Drosophila. Nature 407, 527-30.

Tolwinski, N.S., Wehrli, M., Rives, A., Erdeniz, N., DiNardo, S., Wieschaus, E. (2003). Wg/Wnt signal can be transmitted through Arrow/LRP5,6 and Axin independently of Zw3/Gsk3beta activity.  Developmental Cell 4, 407-18.

Rives, A.F., Rochlin, K.M., Wehrli, M., Schwartz, S.L., DiNardo, S. (2006), Endocytic trafficking of Wingless and its receptors, Arrow and Frizzled-2, in the Drosophila wing.  Developmental Biology 293, 268-83.

Baig-Lewis, S., Peterson-Nedry, W., Wehrli, M. (2007). Wingless/Wnt signal transduction requires distinct initiation and amplification steps that both depend on Arrow/LRP. Developmental Biology, 306, 94-111.

To contact Dr. Wehrli directly: wehrlim@ohsu.edu