Cancer drug R&D spending may be a fraction of the estimate cited by the biopharmaceutical industry.
Sales revenue compared with total company R&D spending including an opportunity cost, or cost of capital, of 7 percent per year, as estimated by Prasad and Mailankody. (Joe Rojas Burke/OHSU)
The average price of anticancer drugs has been rising by about 10 percent annually in recent years, with annual costs for a single drug now routinely running to $100,000 or more. The burden is falling hard on people with cancer. In one study, 34 percent of survivors went into debt (and 9 percent who went into debt filed for bankruptcy) even though 97 percent had health insurance. And when patients face unaffordable copayments, they’re more likely to delay or discontinue treatment.
One justification for the high price of cancer drugs is the required investment in research and development. But a new study co-authored by an OHSU physician estimates that R&D spending is a fraction of the cost cited by drug companies.
“What I would want patients to take away from it is to check your assumptions that these drug prices are warranted,” says Vinay Prasad, M.D., M.P.H., an assistant professor of medicine in the OHSU School of Medicine and member of the OHSU Knight Cancer Institute. “We have to speak up, and make our opinions known that we want drugs to be affordable, profits fair and R&D costs truthfully conveyed to us.”
Sarcoma patients and their families are invited to participate in an interactive panel discussion and have their questions answered by OHSU physicians and surgeons who focus on the cancer, which is rare in adults but accounts for about 20 of all childhood cancers.
‘Medical reversal’ harms patients and undermines faith in the medical system. Hematologist-oncologist Vinay Prasad is pushing to change how medicine adopts new technologies.
Medical reversal is the phenomenon when a medical practice falls out of favor not by being surpassed, but when researchers discover that it didn’t really work all along.
“I think the lesson of reversal is we need robust, large-scale, pragmatic, randomized control trials,” said OHSU assistant professor Vinay Prasad, M.D., M.P.H. “That should be the rule of biomedicine and not the exception.”
Prasad, a hematologist-oncologist with the Knight Cancer Institute and a senior scholar in the Center for Health Care Ethics at OHSU, asserted the case for ending medical reversal in a video interview with MedPage Today.
With a $250,000 award from the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network, researchers will seek to validate biomarkers able to detect pancreas cancer months or years before patients experience overt symptoms of the disease.
Brett Sheppard, M.D.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is the deadliest of the major cancer types, with a five-year survival rate of less than 10 percent. Unlike the other major causes of cancer mortality, pancreatic cancer is increasing in both incidence and number of deaths each year.
Principal investigator Brett Sheppard, M.D., is a professor of surgery in the OHSU School of Medicine. Co-principal investigator Rosalie Sears, Ph.D., is a professor in the Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics. The two are co-directors of the Brenden-Colson Center for Pancreatic Care as well as members of the Knight Cancer Institute.
In a study that kept in touch with more than 500 women cancer survivors for an average of six years, nearly half continued to experience chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and a heightened risk of falling.
The study, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, challenges the widely held assumption that chemotherapy-induced neuropathy will mostly cause no serious long-term effects.
“Many cancer survivors are told these chemo-related symptoms will eventually go away. Our study found that’s just not the case,” said first author Kerri Winters-Stone, Elnora E. Thompson Distinguished Professor in the OHSU School of Nursing and co-leader of the Knight Cancer Institute’s Cancer Prevention and Control Program.
“General Hospital” character Anna Devane ponders her diagnosis.
Polycythemia vera is an uncommon blood cancer that can be controlled with long-established treatments. So it seemed more than a little suspicious to Vinay Prasad, M.D., M.P.H., when the disease took center stage in an episode of “General Hospital” – the longest running daytime drama on American television.
“I felt there had to be some backstory,” Prasad, an OHSU Knight Cancer Institute hematologist-oncologist told listeners of the public radio program Think Out Loud. “What we found was that a company called Incyte Corporation, which actually manufactures a very costly new drug for polycythemia vera, was in a partnership with ‘General Hospital’ and had helped craft this plot line in an effort to raise awareness for this condition.”
Aggressive prostate tumors can rapidly evolve to resist PARP inhibitors, but it may be possible to detect resistance early enough to counteract.
Two views of the structure of the DNA-repair protein PARP1
It was a surprising discovery that opened up a new avenue for treating prostate cancer. In recent years, studies have revealed that gene mutations long associated with breast and ovarian cancers – BRCA1 and BRCA2 – also play a significant role in driving aggressive prostate cancers
Men with these mutations (about 20 percent of prostate cancer patients with metastatic tumors) have shown very high response rates to a new class of drugs called PARP inhibitors, three of which have already gained FDA approval for use in ovarian cancer.
The bad news: Prostate cancers can rapidly evolve to resist PARP inhibitors.
The good news: It may be possible to detect the emergence of resistant cancer cells with just a blood test, researchers have now found, and that could provide earlier information about PARP inhibitor resistance and important clues about how to overcome resistance.